In what for the most part was a largely uneventful game (at least for Pakistan), bowler Mohammad Aamer pulled a fantastic five wicket maiden in the last over; though ultimately it made no difference, as Australia came out victors. The loss was highly reflected in Australia's average of around 10 runs per over, indicating that Pakistan needs to drastically improve its fielding. They should probably also give younger players a chance, considering the contributions of 18 year old Aamer.

To Karachi with Love is an art exhibition held at The 2nd Floor. It aimed at creating awareness and raising funds to help rebuild Bolton Market. Shahid Abdullah is the architect who will be reconstructing the market place; all proceeds will assist in his work. The proceeds will also be awarded to shopkeepers whose livelihoods have been badly effected by the event.
The exhibition showcased work from various photographers including Fursid Sid, M Omair, Tehmina Fatima, Eefa Khalid, Ahmed Shajee, and Emaan Mahmud. The photographers have been able to capture the true essence of Karachi in all its simplicity. It is a collection of images of real people in real situations, and the beauty and struggle behind each of their lives. The initiative taken by these artists is highly commendable and their efforts should be acknowledged.
On April 30th, residents of Clifton Block 6 took a navy officer to court on grounds of misuse of property. The petitioners claim that the accused Commodore (retd) Tajuddin Najmi occupied 172 square yards of land, on which he is allegedly constructing a building to house flats and a Naval League office. This is in direct violation of the area's property regulations, as it is a strictly residential zone. The deputy attorney general claims that the land in fact belongs to the CDGK, and therefore the Navy had no right to occupy the land in the first place. This move by Clifton residents represents a major step towards restricting the influence of the power establishment on civilian affairs.

Now to the final post of the series. Earlier posts mentioned the flaws in Pakistan's current football set up, as well as the economic benefits of improving it. The ideal way to improve Pakistani football is a simple matter of emulating Japan, now the greatest footballing nation in all of Asia. Its hard to believe that only over a decade ago, Japanese football was about the same as the current state of Pakistani football. There were only departmental teams, and there was very little provision for youth development. The Japanese FA recognized this as a problem, and took steps towards its envisioned future. First, it called a series of meetings with the directors of the largest teams in the country, particularly those who were willing to invest in football. During these meetings, the FA asked the companies to change the names of their teams to match that of the home city; which would go on to boost team fan bases exponentially. The FA then imposed regulations on the now independent teams, to ensure professionalism. As private companies, each team was responsible for its own marketing; in turn generating their own demand. This ultimately led to the creation of the J-League, Asia's most professional and most popular domestic league. The revenue earned from the league then led to further investments in youth development and new training methods. This model was then taken up by Australia's A-League, USA's Major League Soccer, and India's I-League.
Regardless of the fact that Japan is far more developed, this model is practicable to Pakistan. A public-private partnership can make great developments in Pakistani football. As long as it takes one step at a time, Pakistan can become a footballing powerhouse.
This post is dedicated to a man who has always pushed against the status quo: David Barsamian. Barsamian is an Armenian-American radio broadcaster and the director of Alternative Radio, a weekly one-hour interview program largely restricted to leftists and social activists. Among the notable people interviewed include Tariq Ali, Edward Said, Arundhati Roy, Robert Fisk, Howard Zinn, and economist Joseph Stiglitz. Barsamian is however best known for his series of interviews with anarchist Noam Chomsky.David Barsamian is an active critic of US foreign policy, which makes him a hero to many in this region; he has also given many guest lectures on the subject. In 2007, he gave lectures across Pakistan. Barsamian has also won a number of awards for journalism.
On May the 2nd, a large group of people protested on the streets of Gilgit city against the "attitudes" of local policemen. By this the protesters were referring to the alleged man-handling of two "respectable citizens", which then triggered road blocks and burnt tiers all over the city (business as usual in this country). The odd thing is that the policemen were not breaking procedure in any way as the protests might suggest, but were actually following police code as the two "respectable citizens" had violated a ban on pillion riding; yet somehow the protesters have the Gilgit Assembly members convinced that rights have been violated.
Football is today the worlds most followed sport. It is one of the few sports whose influence is not restricted by region, the way cricket and hockey are restricted to the Commonwealth nations. The football "craze" is so extensive that even normally excluded countries like the United States and Australia have invested millions of dollars to join in on the beautiful game. So without a doubt the demand exists, and wherever theres demand theres revenue to be earned.There is a common misconception that football is only profitable at the Brazil, England or Italy level; however, this is untrue. Keeping it closer to home, Japan and South Korea host two of the worlds most competitive football leagues with an international following. Revenue earned from these leagues is not just restricted to the football industry, but spills over into the media, tourism, and transport industries. Stadiums in Japan, South Korea, China, and Saudi Arabia host stadiums packed in the tens of thousands for both domestic and international games. These usually include fans flying in from abroad to support their teams.
The market for football is extensive worldwide, and it is about time Pakistan got in on the action.
On May 1st, an old man was shot and killed in the Hajira sector of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. This man was the innocent casualty of firing over the Line of Control between Azad Kashmir and Indian Occupied Kashmir. According to police officials, Indian troops opened fire without provocation. Whether this is true or not, the peaceful stance taken up recently by the Prime Ministers of the two countries is not reflected in the situation at the Line of Control; where innocent lives are lost over decades-old hostility.
The man pictured on the right is Muhammad Essa. Most of you may not know him, but those that do know very well what this man can do with the ball at his feet. The diminutive forward is captain of the national team, the highest paid footballer in the country at approximately Rs50,000 a month, and arguably the most talented footballer Pakistan has to offer; having led his side to two golds in two years at the South Asian Games. Believe it or not, Essa is not the only talented player in the country.So then what exactly is wrong with Pakistani football? The answer is a horrifically weak domestic football infrastructure. The Pakistan Premier League is made up entirely of departmental teams of both public and private sector organisations; with the best club teams being WAPDA, Pakistan Army, Pakistan Navy, and KRL. The teams are forced to play in severely congested fixture lists, leaving very little time for players to rest; something considered very dangerous in sports, especially for players who receive very little in the way of stamina training and conditioning (another major problem). Both the league and youth structures contribute little towards skill development and physical training, with most of Pakistans best players relying entirely on raw talent.
These are all areas where investment is needed, though much of the funds allocated to the Pakistan Football Federation are pocketed by politicians.

On May the 1st, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani unveiled the new labour policy approved by the cabinet the very same day. This new policy is an embodiment of the PPP's self-proclaimed social agenda; something which has not been evident in much of the economic policies initiated over their two year term. The policy includes a rise in minimum wage from Rs6,000 to Rs7,000, legal support and free medical treatment for workers, free technical education for workers' children, and establishment of monitoring committees to ensure labour laws are enforced. Another important clause is that private companies will now have to pay their staff through banks, which demonstrates a positive move against private sector malpractices. If all these policies are followed through efficiently, it will be a significant step towards social justice and equity.
On Tuesday April 27, a professor of Balochistan University was gunned down in Quetta. Ms Nazima Talib was killed when two masked men opened fire on the rickshaw she was sitting in. She received two bullets to the head, and died in the Civil Hospital before any medical treatment could take place. Members of the Balochistan Liberation Army took responsibility for the attack, claiming it was in retaliation to killings of two Baloch women and torturing of female political workers; two incidents seemingly unrelated to Nazima Talib or the Balochistan University.While some officials claim it may have been a targeted killing, it is difficult to understand what merits the killing of an academic or even what links her to the incidents in question. Whether targeted or simply at the wrong place at the wrong time, there is little evidence to suggest that Nazima Talib deserved to be killed.
According to a report in Dawn News, a technical college in the Murree area is being converted into a prison. The building was constructed in 1987, when locals donated 200 kanals of land which was complimented with an additional 100 kanals purchased by the federal government. The result was a massive multi-block college campus with a 100 bed hostel; the cost: millions of rupees spent on a perpetually empty building. In its entire 23 year life the building's only use was as temporary headquarters for an earthquake-relief NGO in 2005, whose members managed to damage the premises beyond further use; even breaking down a few walls.It seems the federal government is applying fairly simple logic: if the building is empty, why let it go to waste? Indeed, a building of this size can be useful for just about anything with the right investments; the question to be asked is why this investment is directed towards establishing a prison, rather than making the college operational. In this particular case, locals donated their own land and it is unlikely that they would prefer a prison in their locale.

With the leaked release of FIFA World Cup 2010 for the Xbox 360 hitting stores all over the country, Pakistani console owners have been reminded of the sad fact that football and Pakistan just don't go together. Those of you who haven't played the game have probably assumed that the green & whites have been excluded, but its actually far worse than that. The Pakistan national football team is among the 199 licensed teams present in the game, with players like Zesh Rehman, Imran Niazi, and Pakistan's highest paid player Muhammad Essa (Rs 50,000 a month); but from a possible team rating of 5 stars, Pakistan stands at half a star.
So what is it about Pakistan that just wont let it get anywhere with the world's most watched sport? Why is it that economically inferior countries like Ghana, Cameroon, and Nigeria can qualify for the World Cup, but Pakistan can't even qualify for the qualifiers? For those who missed that, The Greenshirts were beaten, bruised, touched in funny places, and tossed away by war torn Iraq 7-0. Indeed, a comprehensive investigation is needed to answer those questions; answers soon to be posted.
Keep checking in for the following posts:
1-Why Pakistan is No Good at Football
2-The Economic Benefits of Becoming a Footballing Nation
3-How Pakistan can Become a Football Powerhouse

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently ordered that a bill be submitted to parliament on the banning of Islamic face veils in all public places. This move came some time after the Belgian parliament decided to take up a similar bill, whose voting is to take place on April 22. The issue is much more controversial in France however, as they have a Muslim population of 5 million; the largest in western Europe. The issue may be problematic for the Sarkozy administration, as the French Constitution provides for freedom of religion.
The key difference between France and Belgium is the reason stated for proposing such a bill. Belgian parliamentarians claim the bill is needed because of the security threat of being unable to see a person's face, especially when burqas and veils have been used by militants and criminals before; a seemingly valid reason. On the other hand, the French President stated that the Islamic face veil stigmatizes and threatens the dignity of women. Well then, take a look at the women pictured below. What poses the greatest threat to their dignity? Would the forceful removal of their face veils not stigmatize them?



According to a recent survey by the BBC, Asians are the least likely to vote during the coming UK general elections. Within Asians unsurprisingly, British Pakistanis are the very least likely to vote. Only 38 percent of Pakistanis said they intend to vote in the coming elections, compared to 45 percent for Asians as a whole. Is it because 62 percent of British Pakistanis aren't fond of any of their local candidates, or more likely, is it because they don't know their candidates at all?
Here is the inherent problem with Pakistanis anywhere in the world; be it the US, UK, or Canada, Pakistanis fail to assimilate. In fact, as most of them ignore local customs, practices, and values, it seems they refuse to integrate. Over the years they've developed a strange practice of leaving Pakistan, and creating 'Little Pakistans" in every major city of the world; managing to disrepute the nation in the process. So how would you expect Pakistanis to vote during British elections, when most of them think they're still in Pakistan?
Over the past few years, it seems like all people ever talk about is how great India is.
[More]
"Oh India is one of the fastest growing economies!"
"Look at them, they have Tata, they have Birla, they have Ambani! What do you have?"
"If only we were more like India...."
Indeed, it must hurt to be India's ugly little sister; especially when Mommy and Daddy wish you were just like her. Its true, India is one of the worlds fastest growing economies; averaging an annual growth rate of 5.8% over the last two decades, and now holding the title of 4th largest economy. So how do you expect Pakistan to compete with that? Wait... oh my god, she's come home pregnant! Oh she's getting a beating today.
Well the 2010 statistics are out, and it doesn't look too good for big sis. Apparently the 4th largest economy in the world has now added 100 million people below the poverty line over the past six years; totaling 410 million people, which is 37.2% of its population. If that wasn't enough, India also has a third of the worlds poor population; which is below $2 a day.
So stand up Pakistan, step out of your sister's shadow! Its your time to shine.
Federal Minister for Environment Hameedullah Jan Afridi has added a public park to his Islamabad Sector F estate. The Rs90 million, 10 kanal park was taken from the Capital Development Authority citing security threats to the minister's family. The chairman of the Capital Development Authority concurred with Mr. Afridi, and also added that the minister had provided Rs1 million for the development of the park; which included stream pipes and a perimeter fence. Both the minister and the CDA rejected the notion that the park was closed to the public. So should it be assumed that the fence is to keep out robots?
[More]
Its undoubtedly strange that a minister would grab a piece of land and put a fence around it, usually taken as a sign to keep people out, and say it was open to the public. The federal minister stated he needs the park for security reasons, or in other words to keep people out; yet he stated that people were allowed to enter as they please. Contradiction maybe?

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met with US President Barack Obama in Washington on Sunday. Among other issues, Prime Minister Singh expressed concerns over US providing Pakistan with military aid; he also made it clear that his government had no intentions of holding bilateral talks with Pakistan. The Prime Minister further added his reservations over Pakistan's attempt to gain nuclear status.
To some extent, Prime Minister Singh's reservations are justified. Apart from a history of tense relations between the two countries, which so far has prevented troops from vacating the border, India has still not received any closure on the Mumbai attacks. India has made it clear that they would not make any progress unless the perpetrators of the attacks are brought to justice, and Pakistan may have to respect that. At least this sounds like a credible argument when presented by the Indian Prime Minister.
The truth is, major progress has been made in the Mumbai case; key actors of the attacks have already been tracked down and arrested. This means India now no longer have an excuse for holding off crucial talks with Pakistan. If these age old issues are not addressed, social, political, and economic progress cannot be made; this is not only a hindrance for the two countries, but for the entire region. On observing the insistence of India on not holding talks with Pakistan, one might say India has no intention of normalizing relations and restoring peace and stability to the region.

President Asif Ali Zardari recently signed the Eighteenth Amendment Bill after its approval by parliament. Many has seen this move as noble and heroic, as the bill includes a major clause relating to the powers of the President; particularly, his ability to dissolve parliament. In purely technical terms, the passing of the bill will lead to the President losing much of his power in favor of a parliamentary system of government. However, this may not be the reality.
Though the passing of the bill will mean that Prime Minister Gilani is the official head of government, President Zardari holds a position far more valuable in a country with a weak political framework. This position does not refer to the seat of President, but to the seat of chairman of the ruling party. As Co-Chairman of the Peoples Party, President Zardari still dictates the plays much like a football coach: he need not be on the field, but all moves go through him.
If the football metaphor does not suffice, here is a more practical comparison. In Russia two years ago, President Vladimir Putin was replaced by Dmitry Medvedev. As Putin was ineligible to be re-elected as President, United Russia decided to give their Chairman the subordinate position of Prime Minister. Any Russian political analyst can testify however, that Vladimir Putin is still very much in charge.
For an example a lot closer to home, take a look at neighboring India. The Prime Minister has been Manmohan Singh the economist for some time now. However, it is clear from his lack of political experience that Congress would never give him any real power, and Congress President Sonia Ghandi is much more likely to be in charge.
So is Pakistan really returning to the parliamentary system, or will President Zardari take on the Putin-Ghandi role?

Last night on March 31st, the members of the Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional Reforms signed the draft document of the 18th Amendment. Among the many reforms are curtailment of the President's power in favor of Parliament, renaming of NWFP to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and an organized system of appointing Superior Court judges.
The man pictured above is Usman Mahar, vice-president of the labour union in Mari Gas Company. This man was allegedly kidnapped and tortured by a group of masked men, who went on to shave his head, and pierce his nose with a cord of threads. Mahar claims these men were hired by his manager at the Mari Gas Company, in response to his active opposition to certain contract policies.This is the state of Pakistan's labour force. The highly under-paid workers suffer further ridicule when their union leaders, trusted to safeguard their rights, are subjected to torture and humiliation.

On March 14th, Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif issued a controversial statement regarding the recent string of bombings in the provincial capital. The PML-N President stated that since his party, like the Taliban, opposed the Musharraf regime, the Taliban should not carry out acts of terror in Punjab. This highly irresponsible statement came with showering criticism, including both treasury and opposition benches in the National Assembly. Punjab Governor Salman Taseer went as far as branding Shahbaz Sharif an ally of the terrorists. This was followed by a vague response from the Chief Minister claiming he was quoted out of context.
Calling Shahbaz Sharif an ally of the terrorists for this careless slip would be somewhat of a stretch. To be fair to him, he is the Chief Minister of Punjab and therefore, he is expected to speak in the provincial context. However, pleading to the Taliban to spare his province, particularly when national consensus is needed most to strengthen the anti-terrorism cause, is simply irresponsible. His statement not only implied that his party is sympathetic to the Taliban, but also that the terrorist attacks in other provinces were justified. It is therefore absolutely necessary for Shahbaz Sharif to publicly apologize for his statement.
I came across an ad on television the other day that caught my attention. It was a montage consisting of passionate speeches given by Z.A. Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto, and Bilawal Zardari respectively; with a little red, black, and green here and there. At first it seemed like an ordinary political ad, which in that case is nothing out of the ordinary. What really bothered me was the Pakistan Ministry of Information logo at the end of the ad. This is not only an abuse of public funds and the power of the state, but also an insult to the principles of a republic. This is much bigger than a party flag hoisted at a minister's house, or elected officials chanting party slogans. There needs to be a separation of politics and governance.
[More]
After the failure of attempted peace deals some time ago, many including myself began to like the idea of a military operation in Swat and all other militant-infested regions. The logic was simple: if they don't want peace, then we have no other choice. The Taliban were enjoying their position of power; therefore, we had to teach them a lesson. Alas, a long time has passed since then, and I've slowly come to realize that things can only get worse. What truly hit me, was the fact that we're not fighting religious extremists, we're killing thousands of our own people; the sooner we realize that, the sooner we achieve peace.
[More]
Think about the answers to these questions: Does every militant recruited truly fight for the cause set forth by the Taliban elite? Did every suicide bomber give his life to lay with seventy virgins in Heaven? Does their hatred really stem from the idea that we are all un-Islamic? If you thought yes, then you are very mistaken. The militants' actions are not religiously motivated, and anyone who can look beyond the terrorist stereotype set by the Western media can see that. The real reason is the failure of governments, past and present, to improve the socio-economic conditions in the region while the rest of us live in luxury; a form of oppression in itself. We dream of Bentleys, touchscreen computers, and 5000 square yard houses; they dream of three meals a day, homes that don't collapse from unpleasant weather, and being able to leave those homes without being raped or killed. So tell me, what do people do when they're oppressed? They stand up and fight back.
We say that advancing on militants and taking down their leaders is progress, but thats not their driving force. We then say that we'll reopen schools, but they never worked in the first place. Gunning down a militant is not defeating a terrorist, but is killing someone's brother, husband, or father; a man fighting for their rights. So why wouldn't more people take up arms for the sake of their deceased loved ones? If the government wont make their lives better, they have to fight for it; the cycle continues.
For those of you living privileged lives who think they know more about Islam than the militants, tell me this: would the Holy Prophet send troops to massacre his own people, simply because they fought for their basic human rights? I hope you all said no. Therefore, I believe the only solution is to allocate a chunk of our budget, taking whatever aid we can get, to drastically improve infrastructure in the region. Investment in the agricultural and industrial sectors will provide more jobs. Carefully monitored schools will increase opportunities for coming generations, as well as increase awareness. Recreational facilities, such as football pitches, parks, and playgrounds, will also greatly improve the general standard of living. Most importantly however, an efficient, organized, and fully trained police force composed of locals rather than outside military men will instill a much stronger feeling of security in the long run. With all these factors in effect, there is no need for military involvement at all.
Like many countries around the world, Saudi Arabia has a significant population of South Asian immigrants. Along with migrants from Africa and settlers from other poorer Arab states, South Asians fill up the blue-collar jobs that the proud oil-rich Saudis don't want; a common pattern among most affluent countries. Unlike in other countries however, most immigrants in Saudi Arabia are victims at the hands of discriminatory employment and property laws, along with little or no social security or welfare from their country of residence. Apart from not being able to seek Saudi citizenship (legal provision exists, but is very rarely granted), immigrants are not allowed to own properties or businesses without a Saudi co-owner (which can be taken away at any time), their contracts and residence permits can be terminated at any time without warning, their children cannot attend most public universities (only one is open to international students), and in the case of white-collar workers, their earnings are a small fraction compared to that of their Saudi co-workers and subordinates. With the world focused on the state of women in the Kingdom, these issues are often overlooked.
The key difference that sets South Asians apart from other immigrant groups is that they recieve little or no assistance from their home countries' embassies and governments; this is particularly the case for Pakistan. This indifference from Islamabad leaves our citizens vulnerable to further victimization and harassment from Saudi authorities. Saudi police in particular find pleasure in harassing vulnerable Pakistanis, who now can't even cross the street without all their papers in hand. In public establishments, including hospitals, Pakistanis are made to wait hours to be serviced. It gets worse: every year more and more Pakistanis lose their jobs, and are left stranded in Saudi Arabia as illegal aliens with no means to return home. For these problems to be solved, the Pakistani government needs to take initiative and stand up for its citizens.
[More]
The key difference that sets South Asians apart from other immigrant groups is that they recieve little or no assistance from their home countries' embassies and governments; this is particularly the case for Pakistan. This indifference from Islamabad leaves our citizens vulnerable to further victimization and harassment from Saudi authorities. Saudi police in particular find pleasure in harassing vulnerable Pakistanis, who now can't even cross the street without all their papers in hand. In public establishments, including hospitals, Pakistanis are made to wait hours to be serviced. It gets worse: every year more and more Pakistanis lose their jobs, and are left stranded in Saudi Arabia as illegal aliens with no means to return home. For these problems to be solved, the Pakistani government needs to take initiative and stand up for its citizens.
